|
Post by elliott on Mar 31, 2019 17:38:03 GMT -5
She is great at selling. And offensively
|
|
|
Post by elliott on Mar 31, 2019 20:16:45 GMT -5
Another thing I learned is that the "Terry Funk's GOAT case is hurt by a lack of classics" talking point is wrong. I had 10 Terry Funk matches make my final list, another one was my literal last cut, and I can think of at least 10 more I strongly considered.
|
|
|
Post by microstatistics on Apr 1, 2019 1:15:27 GMT -5
- Agree with the Santo comments on the previous page. He is still not quite GOAT level for me but this project elevated him in my eyes and he might have leapfrogged Casas as my #2 luchador.
- Speaking of, Casas and Tenryu struggle when it comes to high end matches.
- 2004 is one of the best wrestling years
- Not as high on 90s AJPW as I used to be, though many of the top matches still made my list quite easily
- 1991 is a very weak wrestling year and sticks out like a sore thumb compared to the loaded years of the 90s
- Flair the Brawler >> Flair the Technician
|
|
|
Post by KB8 on Apr 1, 2019 9:03:16 GMT -5
Tenryu will have about as many matches on my final list as anyone so I absolutely disagree on him struggling with high end matches. Casas will be pretty well represented too (and I think he's the best to ever do it anyway).
Agreed on brawling Flair being the best Flair. The parts during his lengthier title matches where things break down into a fight are routinely my favourite parts of those matches now, and at this point I'd much rather watch him against Morton or Funk (and Garvin, whenever they're beating the brakes of each other) than guys like Windham or Steamboat (though Flair/Steamboat chop exchanges always rule).
Kandori was someone I wound up digging way more than I expected during the GWE poll and she's only gone up in my estimation during this. That Hotta feud is badass and the August 97 tag is a joshi MOTDC to me. Mariko Yoshida is another woman who I'd never really given a ton of thought to prior to the GWE project and she was someone else who I wound up loving. Her stock has also continued to rise during this, and even if she won't have a bunch of matches on my list she'd be my highest ranking joshi worker on a revised GWE list.
High end lucha and high end shoot style are my favourite kinds of wrestling. I already knew that before this project but it's certainly been reinforced as a result of it.
I'm nowhere near as fond of 90s All Japan as I was 10-15 years ago, but when it's good it is fucking good. It won't be terribly well represented on my list just because I haven't seen so much of it in over a decade and never got around to rewatching a ton of it, but the real superclassics that I did get around to checking out again mostly all held up great.
|
|
|
Post by Cap on Apr 1, 2019 10:53:44 GMT -5
The kandori/hotta feud is a weird blind spot for me. I have never been able to find the highly recommended match of theirs.
|
|
|
Post by KB8 on Apr 1, 2019 11:56:32 GMT -5
Top one is the 3/21/98 singles match, bottom one is the 8/15/97 show and the Kandori/Endo v Hotta/Maekawa tag starts around 43 minutes in. Watch the tag first, I guess, just to whet your appetite for the singles.
|
|
|
Post by Cap on Apr 1, 2019 17:46:16 GMT -5
Thanks a ton. I already submitted my list so I am sure this will just give me a bunch of anxiety about how I wish I had waited a day, but I am really pumped to watch this.
|
|
|
Post by Cap on Apr 1, 2019 19:02:50 GMT -5
So some stuff I learned about my taste.
I think the biggest take away for me is that I like brutality and I am not totally sure how I feel about that. I'll eventually post my list after the the deadline with some commentary or something, and if you care to look at the whole thing you will see I clearly put a premium on two people actually beating the shit out of one another. I guess I have always known it and it has never really bothered me, but something about seeing my list really made it clear how much value I place on a match being brutal, maybe even going off the rails in a way that is boarderline unsafe. In some ways that bothers me a bit. I don't want encourage or celebrate wrestling that is dangerous or actually hurts people. Part of what I like about wrestling and respect about wrestlers is their ability to do all this without murdering one another. At the same time, I think what I really like about those matches is there is something unpredictable and organic about them. I love organic, natural moments and matches and it is just so hard to fake it. This feels like something I may work to articulate more fully later (over summer maybe).
Stan Hansen and Kenta Kobashi are the best big match workers of all time in my eyes. I think more than anyone else (even other wrestlers with lots of representation on my list) their matches feel big and important to me. They feel like they could do it at any moment. People like El Hijo Del Santo, Kandori, Flair, Misawa, Jumbo, Danielson all show well on my list and are all in that conversion as well, but to me Hansen and Kobashi sort of stand alone in that regard (and it shows in how well both their singles matches with one another did for me).
The one potential exception to this might be Sangre Chicana. If we had as much footage on him and if I had seen as much footage from him in his prime as I have on the people listed above he might run away with the most spots on this list.
I am sort of a match guy, but this project also really reinforced what a small sliver of wrestling big matches are. LA Park is probably one of my top 5-7 favorite wrestlers ever and he doesn't have a single match on my list right now. Part of that was maybe me not getting to revisit two matches that I really wanted to, but I got to look at quite a bit recently and it just didn't get there. I still think he is absolutely brilliant. Obviously, there are endless examples of this. The project itself just drove home how we are dealing with a really fun but relatively small piece of the pie we call wrestling.
Some classics that started high for me fell a decent amount as I put in the last of my tape time. Matches that started as top 10 fell a good bit, still classics in my mind, but when I was really parsing out what I thought the best match ever was for me, they were clearly riding a bit on reputation and/or that first watch. Bockwinkel/Hennig, Jumbo/Tenryu and the first two of the big three Lawler/Dundee LLT matches are the biggest examples of this in terms of universally accepted classics. They all still finished in my top 100 and some finished really well, but they gave way to some matches I didn't expect to have as high.
A personal example of this is Nigel vs Danielson (United). That is a match that has – since I saw it for the first time – at the absolute top levels of greatness. It still did quite well on my list, but it dropped pretty hard in the 11th hour and it pained me.
I like lots of different types of wrestling. That may sound a little conceded in tone, but I am kind of ok with that. I don't mean it to sound "worldly" especially around this group of extremely knowledgable fans. I just like that I enjoy lots of different types of wrestling. I have really varied list that certainly reflects my biases and personal tastes, but I like how diverse it is all the same. Honestly, all the lists I have seen submitted so far are varied and diverse in their own way, which makes this project pretty rewarding to go through.
I was a little surprised by how poorly matches on U.S. soil did at the top of the list. I am not really sure what to make of it on the whole, but I may want to try to carve out some time to watch top end U.S. matches right up next to some matches that finished well on my list. I really enjoyed the direct comparison/contrasts so that is something I will continue to do.
|
|
|
Post by microstatistics on Apr 2, 2019 15:52:09 GMT -5
So some stuff I learned about my taste. I think the biggest take away for me is that I like brutality and I am not totally sure how I feel about that. I'll eventually post my list after the the deadline with some commentary or something, and if you care to look at the whole thing you will see I clearly put a premium on two people actually beating the shit out of one another. I guess I have always known it and it has never really bothered me, but something about seeing my list really made it clear how much value I place on a match being brutal, maybe even going off the rails in a way that is boarderline unsafe. In some ways that bothers me a bit. I don't want encourage or celebrate wrestling that is dangerous or actually hurts people. Part of what I like about wrestling and respect about wrestlers is their ability to do all this without murdering one another. At the same time, I think what I really like about those matches is there is something unpredictable and organic about them. I love organic, natural moments and matches and it is just so hard to fake it. This feels like something I may work to articulate more fully later (over summer maybe). Stan Hansen and Kenta Kobashi are the best big match workers of all time in my eyes. I think more than anyone else (even other wrestlers with lots of representation on my list) their matches feel big and important to me. They feel like they could do it at any moment. People like El Hijo Del Santo, Kandori, Flair, Misawa, Jumbo, Danielson all show well on my list and are all in that conversion as well, but to me Hansen and Kobashi sort of stand alone in that regard (and it shows in how well both their singles matches with one another did for me). The one potential exception to this might be Sangre Chicana. If we had as much footage on him and if I had seen as much footage from him in his prime as I have on the people listed above he might run away with the most spots on this list. I am sort of a match guy, but this project also really reinforced what a small sliver of wrestling big matches are. LA Park is probably one of my top 5-7 favorite wrestlers ever and he doesn't have a single match on my list right now. Part of that was maybe me not getting to revisit two matches that I really wanted to, but I got to look at quite a bit recently and it just didn't get there. I still think he is absolutely brilliant. Obviously, there are endless examples of this. The project itself just drove home how we are dealing with a really fun but relatively small piece of the pie we call wrestling. Some classics that started high for me fell a decent amount as I put in the last of my tape time. Matches that started as top 10 fell a good bit, still classics in my mind, but when I was really parsing out what I thought the best match ever was for me, they were clearly riding a bit on reputation and/or that first watch. Bockwinkel/Hennig, Jumbo/Tenryu and the first two of the big three Lawler/Dundee LLT matches are the biggest examples of this in terms of universally accepted classics. They all still finished in my top 100 and some finished really well, but they gave way to some matches I didn't expect to have as high. A personal example of this is Nigel vs Danielson (United). That is a match that has – since I saw it for the first time – at the absolute top levels of greatness. It still did quite well on my list, but it dropped pretty hard in the 11th hour and it pained me. I like lots of different types of wrestling. That may sound a little conceded in tone, but I am kind of ok with that. I don't mean it to sound "worldly" especially around this group of extremely knowledgable fans. I just like that I enjoy lots of different types of wrestling. I have really varied list that certainly reflects my biases and personal tastes, but I like how diverse it is all the same. Honestly, all the lists I have seen submitted so far are varied and diverse in their own way, which makes this project pretty rewarding to go through. I was a little surprised by how poorly matches on U.S. soil did at the top of the list. I am not really sure what to make of it on the whole, but I may want to try to carve out some time to watch top end U.S. matches right up next to some matches that finished well on my list. I really enjoyed the direct comparison/contrasts so that is something I will continue to do. 100% agree with the highlighted part. Great overall post too.
|
|
|
Post by elliott on Apr 2, 2019 17:35:51 GMT -5
Some things I expected going in played out. I've been vocal about preferring brawls and over half of the matches that made my list were brawls including 16 of my top 20!
I would say my biggest surprise was how well Joshi did on my list. I had 14 joshi matches make my final list with 2 in my top 4 and 4 in my top 10. The Joshi I really liked was more storytelling and spectacle based though instead of what folks usually think of when they think of Joshi.
|
|
|
Post by elliott on Apr 16, 2019 15:27:01 GMT -5
I think one of the major things I learned was that I would much rather watch a match between two different wrestlers than two similar wrestlers. Whether the difference is in size, experience, or working styles that doesn't really matter as much.
For example, if you gave me the option of watching Hashimoto vs Liger or Liger vs Sasuke, I'm taking the Hash match. It's a big reason why I'm drawn to something like Otsuka vs Matsunaga or the Santo vs Casas FMW trios from LA. Its probably why I'd rather watch every Hansen vs Kobashi match over every Misawa vs Kobashi match (although I love 1/20/97). Its why Flair vs Morton makes my top 100 but Flair vs Steamboat does not.
There are definite exceptions. Lawler vs Dundee and Tamura vs Kohsaka being the obvious ones. But "these two guys know each other so well and are so similar anybody could win" isn't a baseline narrative that appeals to me nearly as much as it used to.
|
|
|
Post by Pterois on Apr 16, 2019 16:02:58 GMT -5
Really interesting Elliott. As far as I'm concerned, I much prefer Flair/Steamboat to Flair/Morton but it's not a problem at all, your tastes in wrestling are extremely interesting. I'd be glad to see your ballot.
|
|