|
Post by fxnj on Dec 26, 2023 14:32:11 GMT -5
Scared to rewatch, but i remember digging Tamura/Hyuga ~10 years ago. Good one if you’re into workrate and big moves.
|
|
|
Post by rana on Dec 26, 2023 17:03:42 GMT -5
Gonzalez/Surena and Nakano/Funaki come to mind. Team Anarchy/Devil's Rejects War Games in 06 will probably make my ballot and hasn't been mentioned yet.
|
|
|
Post by [Darren] on Dec 26, 2023 17:49:44 GMT -5
Nakano/Funaki & Toyoda/Kudo are the ones that stand out to me.
|
|
|
Post by microstatistics on Dec 27, 2023 18:32:20 GMT -5
This is an interesting question and one that is almost paradoxical because of the two conditions below related to the definition of a Top 100 wrestler
1) If a wrestler is capable of having a Top 100 match, they are probably intrinsically Top 100-worthy (or, at the very least, a contender) 2) If a wrestler is not capable of having a Top 100 match but is in one anyway, that means the opponent is a virtual shoo-in for the Top 100 since they are able to work with/around limited wrestlers and deliver something special.
For instance, from the matches listed above, I can easily see Edge, Masakatsu Funaki, HHH, Kurt Angle, Megumi Kudo, Azumi Hyuga, Pirata Morgan as Top 100 picks.
Hence, a tag match is probably the best answer to this question since the burden of quality is more evenly distributed. Maybe Revival vs. DIY or Triple X vs. AMW, though, again, I can see rating Christopher Daniels or the FTR guys or Gargano as Top 100.
That's why I'm gonna go with Francis Sullivan/Albert Sanniez vs. Bernard Caclard/Tony Martino (France, 10/21/1967). A Top 100 match contender with the loophole that the wrestlers involved lack the footage necessary to really be considered Top 100 wrester contenders.
|
|
|
Post by enviousstupid on Feb 28, 2024 7:54:45 GMT -5
Duggan/DiBiase
|
|