|
|
Post by elliott on Jun 5, 2023 17:25:34 GMT -5
Kadaveri mentioned the 12/10/93 Hokuto & Toyota vs Kyoko & Yamada matches being something they'd like to consider as one match. I think someone else brought up that Misawa/Kawada/Kobashi triangle match bullshit.
What else is a segment or pair of matches that you think should count as one?
I'm in favor of those mentioned. I'd push for Bret vs Doink & Lawler from SummerSlam 93 as something to consider as one big match. Any others?
|
|
|
|
Post by tetsujin on Jun 5, 2023 17:45:19 GMT -5
The MITB cash ins right after big matches. When people talk about Cena/Bryan they will probably include the post match as part of the overall experience, for example.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrjmml on Jun 5, 2023 17:53:53 GMT -5
The MITB cash ins right after big matches. When people talk about Cena/Bryan they will probably include the post match as part of the overall experience, for example. I second this. |
|
|
|
Post by mrjmml on Jun 5, 2023 17:55:30 GMT -5
Like Roman vs Brock in WM 31 that ended with Seth Rollins winning the title.
|
|
|
|
Post by elliott on Jun 5, 2023 18:15:38 GMT -5
The big NJPW Gauntlet matches should be counted as one match instead of individual matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrjmml on Jun 5, 2023 18:23:23 GMT -5
The big NJPW Gauntlet matches should be counted as one match instead of individual matches. We already count them as one I think. |
|
|
|
Post by elliott on Jun 5, 2023 18:29:38 GMT -5
Yes, just confirming them if anyone in the future has questions
|
|
|
|
Post by nintendologic on Jun 6, 2023 8:01:25 GMT -5
Like Roman vs Brock in WM 31 that ended with Seth Rollins winning the title. In that case, the match was still ongoing when Rollins cashed in, so there's no reason to not count it as one match. |
|
|
|
Post by Kadaveri on Jun 6, 2023 17:08:29 GMT -5
Like Roman vs Brock in WM 31 that ended with Seth Rollins winning the title. In that case, the match was still ongoing when Rollins cashed in, so there's no reason to not count it as one match. You could interpret the cash in as meaning the Brock vs. Roman match singles match ends in some form of no contest and the triple threat is an entirely new match that begins just after. |
|
|
|
Post by mrjmml on Jun 6, 2023 17:57:03 GMT -5
In that case, the match was still ongoing when Rollins cashed in, so there's no reason to not count it as one match. You could interpret the cash in as meaning the Brock vs. Roman match singles match ends in some form of no contest and the triple threat is an entirely new match that begins just after. I thought that. |
|
